Відео

Leroy Burrell didn't make 100 or 200 lists nor an honorable mention.

Leroy Burrell didn't make 100 or 200 lists nor an honorable mention.

Drug cheats can’t be considered underrated.

Walter Dix, Kirk Baptist, Kenny Bednerick, to name a few.

I'm 6 foot 3 and I can still sprint u just gotta keep practicing and running more

I think Bolt not improving past his 2009 feats is nature's way of preventing the sport from being broken 😂 imagine we get a 9.49 and 18.99.... we will be getting a situation worse than flojo, not to say that it is already somewhat like that right now for the men

Bolts the fastest but his form is far from the best

Flo Jo and Carl Lewis...

Technique ? Just technique ? Not considering , height , strength, stamina and leg speed ? Cuz, you can be a slow leg speed , weak, and short person with no stamina , and have perfect technique and do your 20+ second 100m runs with prefect technique. Usain Bolt does not have the perfect or best technique just because he is the fastest. I vote for Frankie Fredricks. He has the most prefect technique of any runner I have ever seen, in my opinion.

Clickbait

Brilliant Brilliant Brilliant and not out of the realm of possibility....someone PLEASE send this video to the world athletics board

I'm sorry, but hamstrings not being mentioned is a big mistake in my opionion. Hamstrings and glutes and psoas is where top speed comes from, where as quads are the driving phase muscle, and in my experience as a 10.50 sprinter with 15+ years of training under my belt, hamstring genetics/development is one of the main factors with extraordinary sprinters For example those who are blessed with elite genetics had insane hamstrings and even without spacific training were repping nordics, where as i only got there with training and saw my top speed increase noticably after putting more focus on that part of my body.

That woman in white hair I seen her MANY MANY MANY for sure times, but I never remember her name or if she achieved anything.

Particular in the sprint when it is all over after 100m women are all amazing. I am talking ONLY about the top elite. I need a UA-cam video explaining what women could be just as males in long distance running. I have feeling it >might< be so. What does male bone weigh and what does female bones weigh. ´Make a video about THAT and then explain marathons where I in my wild mind think females have a chance. I guess many countries pick sports and training methods that cost less. Netherlands did not have to do that .... it is just a bunch of trainers and a lot of athletes getting super competent in running. Same with bicycle. Netherlands have a bunch of trainers and athletes who have a targeted training. They did not need to select such cheap sports but they did and it all continued from there ... so they are in a flow. And that might end.

Merlene Ottey ??

Flo-jo has the best sprinting form and technique.

I think raw speed shines more on the relay while athletes with less raw speed can compensate with technical ability at the start of the 100m

Ben Johnson is only an honorable mention??? The guy who started so fast he was getting called for false starts? He's the greatest in my opinion... not only the greatest starter but the best at the 60m and the 100m.

BEN FREAKING JOHNSON best in the 100m of ALL TIME

Jesse Owens, Robert "Bob" Hayes...

Fireee

Be black.

imo the next record holders of the 100m record will have to be dual dominant sprinters since one would have to excessively go much faster than bolts highest recorded speed to make up for the poorer start which i very much doubt could ever happen

🌲🍿👀🇿🇼🇿🇼🇿🇼🇿🇼🇿🇼🇿🇼🇿🇼🇿🇼🇿🇼🌲🏃🏾‍♂️💥💨💨💨💨💨💨

Tortu is exceptional

great video! can you do one for women?

I think you can be predisposed to an archetype so-to-speak, but I have often had weakpoints in my racing that I concentrated on and they became my strong points (stuff like muscle contraction, tendon, fascia). You even have guys like Erriyon Knighton who you would think are skinny, elastic but also have the connotation of 'weak/frail' because of their small joints, narrow rib cage and narrow hips (which is thought to be less advantageous for weightlifting) but he is still extremely strong in the Gym.. There are patterns like with everything, but the individual athlete might have so many different things going where it's hard to put them in a category, only once your a sub-10 guy and have a definite race strategy that doesn't change (like degrasse, lemaitre) only then would I be comfortable with putting them in a category. you also have these types like Matthew Boling, Wayde Van Niekerk, Fred Kerley who are great generalists and have very 'average' body dimensions/good distribution of performance for all of the events.

People like seeing speed differences ie the fastest footballer leaving normal guys behind. Just watching 8 sprinters who are all fast and look the same relative to each other is not actually that exciting unless you have Bolt level athletes running impossible times

Never forget I raced both my brothers in a fair race back in 18 or 19

I like that comment at the beginning. I hate hearing 'The Way to Win' saying that it is better to run a slower start and drive phase in order to improve the back end. But obviously, if a person's start is bad *because they are technically bad,* their start would get more efficient and less energy-expensive as they improve while getting faster. Maybe it just bothers me because I don't see how to improve one's start without getting technically better. Maybe others are able to put in more energy

Lemaitre was a true finisher. In the 100 there is basically no special anatomy for those archetypes wich is strange. I mean for finishers there are big heavy guys like Fanbuleh, Bolt. There are tall skinny guys like Lemaitre, Prescott. Small skinny guys like DeGrasse or Laird, and lots of hybrids like Gay, Blake, Gatlin, Lyles. I believe it's mostly a neural (muscle activation pattern) thing that decides if one is a good starter or finisher. Also saving sme energy in the first half of the race absolutley will enhance the 2nd half. It's a trade off. At the end it's max V that have the biggest impact. The athlete with the highest max V will win 9/10 times.

Would love to hear your thoughts on a runner like Joseph Fahnbulleh and his archetype.

I always wondered how Degrasse's 100m results have stayed roughly the same since finishing college yet his 200m times continued to improve and every year he runs in the relay he goes God mode, even in 2022 when he was out of form

I'm 71 years old. I've been a distance road runner for over50 years. I signed up for the 100m, 400m, and 1500m events at my county's senior games. I had not idea how technical the 100m is to run well. At this point I just hope I don't get injured. ⚕

Incredible video

Ломанный английский слух режет 🤢🤢🤢🤮🤮🤮🤮

The best technique is the one that brings you the records and the golden wares

Great video I am definitely block explosive

I think an important thing to consider is that a lot of people are just more motivated to run better in relays because they’re part of a team

Would letsile be a dual type or a momentum?

Completely unscientific

My favorite is Carl Lewis. Watch this video from the 1992 Olympics of the 4x100 from 11:00 to 11:25. ua-cam.com/video/DAndXDjht-A/v-deo.html In this race, Carl Lewis doesn't run, he floats through the air.

At her peak, she's unbeatable.

Flo Jo is the most technically perfect sprinter ever

Tyson G. is underrated. He could've gotten close to WRs if he didn't zigzag his first 4-8 steps. However, Bolt's the best because he uses long strides and moves side to side.

8分39秒から見られるジャスティン・ガトリンの走りは必見‼️ タイムは確か20秒台だったと思うが これほど見事な走りもなかなかないんじゃないかな！？ 着地によって体幹がゴムボールのように弾みながらも まるで地面の方が後方に流れているかのように見事に水平運動に転換されている‼️✨

145 m to 168 m bolts speed is slow down in 0:50

Blind narrator 😢

This channel is great I just silently upvote any video I >>>>>have<<<<< seen. You have to see first >then< upvote.

You may have considered Tommie Smith and John Carlos on this list as well